Moral equivalence

May 18th, 2009 Egghead
moral-equivalence

Spurred on by a conversation I had the day before, I was thinking yesterday about artificial insemination. Now, I’ve heard moral teaching about why the procdedure is immoral using dry, philosophical language. But yesterday, I looked at the procedure, and came to a realization that startled me.

Artificial insemination is morally equivalent* to prostitution.

If I lived in Nevada (outside of Las Vegas), it would be legal for me, in order to satisfy certain selfish desires, to do the following:

  • visit an establishment that brokers sexual services (a brothel)
  • choose an anonymous woman without forming a relationship with her
  • purchase that woman’s sexual services through the agency of the establishment
  • use those sexual services to satisfy my desire

Throughout the U.S., it is legal for a woman, in order to satisfy her selfish desire to have a child outside of wedlock to do the following:

Artificial insemination and prostitution are moral equivalents. So why, in this hypocritical American society, is one accepted and one scorned? Is it simply because one is new and the other age-old? Or is because men’s sexuality is icky, while a woman’s is always pure and uncorrupted? Either accept prostitution, and legalize it throughout the nation, or ban artificial insemination in the same states prostitution is banned. They should be treated the same, from a moral standpoint.

*Aside from morality, there are, of course, certain legal differences. One such is in the area of privacy. A prostitute’s privacy is protected. She has legal protections against her client if she did not want him contacting her. On the other hand, in Florida, a sperm-donor’s right to privacy has been deemed by the courts as being trumped by the right of the mother to receive child support for her offspring.

Imagine

January 21st, 2009 Egghead

Rob Case at One Man’s Kingdom posted a very remarkable piece of writing. Go read it. It’s that good.

Useless trinkets

February 19th, 2008 Egghead

Dr. Helen asks Why are Diamonds a Girl’s Best Friend?

Happy Schadenfreude Day!

February 14th, 2008 Egghead
happy-schadenfreude-day

In the past generation, the powers-that-be have conspired to turn Valentine’s day from a day where people exchanged tokens of love into a day where men are required to abase themselves and debase their personal economies by giving ridiculously expensive gifts to women in return for …civility.

What the hell is wrong with that picture?

For me, it’s still a day to celebrate, however. I celebrate my freedom from this burden. Last night I went to Wal-mart to buy a few little gifts for my 5-year-old nephew*, and was utterly repulsed by the crowds of people in there.

I have to admit to a bit of schadenfreude. It’s not quite so much taking pleasure at the suffering of men out there who have to buy cut roses, diamond rings, chocolate, and other useless trinkets for the demanding women in their lives, but rather relief at not having to.

(By the way, what does dead plant material, crystallized carbon mounted on circlets of debased soft metals, and highly-fattening foods of questionable nutritional value have to do with romance?)

Tonight, I plan to celebrate being single.

 
 

*Army men and toy cars. What boy wouldn’t love those toys?

People mistaking GYOW with being married

February 4th, 2008 Egghead
people-mistaking-gyow-with-being-married

A while back, I came to the conclusion that I’m better off single than in the dating “game.” I don’t even flirt. That said, I’ve noticed something. When looking for a large purchase, such as land or vehicles, the seller usually asks me about my wife, probably because there’s a co-owner line on the contract. A simple, “I’m not married,” usually is enough for them to drop that line of inquiry. I just chalked that up to the majority of people in my age group are married, so they’re playing the odds.

However, it’s a different situation socially. People make the assumption that I’m married for some unknown reason. At a happy hour one time, a woman in the group began complaining about being single (again) and made it well-known that she wished for a man to date. A male co-worker (I’ll forgive him, because he was drunk) said to her, “What about Egghead, here?” Then she replied, “I can’t date him! He’s married!!! This was, of course, news to me.

Now, I’ve never said I was married. Why did she assume I was? Was it because I had shown no interest in her? I try not to encourage that sort of attention. Does that work out to me putting off some sort of “leave me alone, I’m married” vibe?

I haven’t the foggiest notion, but I wonder.

Three very simple questions

December 3rd, 2007 Egghead
three-very-simple-questions

I have a few questions that should be very easy for supporters of the current way of doing things to answer – if they’re not ashamed of the answers. Here is what I’d lke to ask:

If child support payments are intended to be spent on things the child needs, then

  1. why must payments be sent to the state instead of the child/custodial parent?
    (Could this have anything to do with it?)
  2. Why aren’t custodial parents required to show how the money was spent?
  3. Why are child support payments not calculated on how much the child needs, but on how much the noncustodial parent earns?

Letter to the editor

November 28th, 2007 Egghead

I was actually surprised that they published my letter to the editor. I was responding to this political cartoon, which appeared in my local paper on Monday:
holbert.jpg

I found it quite ironic that the headline “What is a ‘hate crime’”? by Clarence Page (Monday) was right next to a prime example of bigotry — the anti-male screed masquerading as a political cartoon by Jerry Holbert.

– Name withheld,
Springfield

I expect that I’ll either see some irate letters in response, or I’ll be ignored. Probably the latter. I did use big words, after all.

Update 28 January 2008: I was totally, completely ignored. No surprise there.

Men don’t know they don’t want to be married?

November 13th, 2007 Egghead

In this post, MarkyMark parsed Jacinta Tynan’s article entitled “Men, marriage, and ultimatums.” Below is a comment I left on MarkyMark’s blog.

I’m a bit older now. When I was younger, I would have agreed that finding “that special someone” was worth the hard work of looking. But, as I said, I’m a bit older now. My – ah – ardor has cooled off now, and I’ve become very comfortable in the life I’ve built for myself. Upsetting the apple cart by beginning a drama-filled relationship just doesn’t sound all that appealing anymore.

I once read a novel where one character (a woman playing matchmaker) said to another (a younger woman), “I’ve noticed that bachelorhood is habit-forming.” Whether the author of that novel realized it or not, there is a lot of truth in that statement. After having lived as a bachelor for a long time, I don’t feel any strong need to rush out and start a new relationship. So, if women want men to commit to them, they had better get these men while they’re young, because older gentlemen are a much harder fish to land. Unfortunately, young women these days seem to enjoy partying and being unencumbered, even though they plan to get married when they are “older.”

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that the above is a recipe for disaster, now, does it?

Inequality poster

October 30th, 2007 Egghead

inequity.jpg

A sex crime by any other name

September 26th, 2007 Egghead

From the Pacific Sun News:

A sex crime by any other name

Experts refute idea that age-of-consent sex crimes against boys are ‘victimless’

by Ronnie Cohen
Pacific Sun Staff

The defense attorney for a former kindergarten teacher charged with sexually molesting two 15-year-old boys describes the one-night incident in Corte Madera as a victimless crime.

“I don’t know who’s the victim here,” attorney Michael Semansky said of the case against 41-year-old Amy Lee Kelly. “How do you molest a boy who’s 15 years old, who’s filled with testosterone and alcohol and begging for sex? I think it’s a victimless crime.”

But therapists who work with sex offenders and victims of sex crimes paint a different picture. They say sexual relations between 15-year-old boys and a 40-year-old woman can overwhelm boys, traumatizing and scarring them for life.

“Boys, though they can’t acknowledge their vulnerability, have a potential vulnerability that’s equal to females,” said psychologist Michael Grogan, director of San Rafael’s Jeannette Prandi Children’s Center, where sexually abused children are sensitively interviewed. “Boys are subject to the same kind of psychological implications as girls. There has to be an awareness that when you get involved with a person sexually, and you are an adult, there can be ramifications to that child that are lifelong. And I don’t think it matters if it’s a boy or a girl.”

The law treats male and female perpetrators of sex crimes equally. So Kelly, who taught at Bacich Elementary School in Kentfield for 11 years until June 2006, faces the same charges and the same punishment a man would face. In July, the district attorney charged the divorced mother of two with sexually molesting the Redwood High School boys and having unlawful sexual intercourse with one of them.

Kelly, who lives in the East Bay, was released from jail after posting $100,000 bail. Although she has pleaded not guilty, her lawyer said she feels remorseful about her role in the events that unfolded on a Friday night last October in her friend’s Corte Madera home. Semansky blamed alcohol for the alleged sex crimes and said Kelly completed a 90-day alcohol-rehabilitation program after the incident and now volunteers in the recovery community. She faces up to four years in state prison for the sexual intercourse charge. If convicted, she would have to register as a sex offender.

Despite the lack of distinction based upon gender, gender does color community perception about whether a case like the one against Kelly should be prosecuted and even whether it should have been brought to law enforcement’s attention in the first place.

Kathryn Mitchell, chief deputy district attorney, said numerous adults had knowledge about the drunken incident, which took place while Kelly was visiting her friend last October. “A lot of people apparently knew all about this and didn’t come forward in the fashion they should have,” Mitchell said.

According to court documents, Kelly told her friend–in whose home the incident occurred–about the sexual activity the following morning. Instead of summoning authorities, the hostess found the alleged victims–friends of the hostess’ 15-year-old daughter–at a Redwood High School football game, and the three of them vowed to keep the incident secret.

“That’s a pretty big secret for a 15-year-old to have to maintain,” said a therapist who works with Marin County sex offenders and requested anonymity. “Can’t tell your friends. Can’t tell your family. They’re afraid they’ll get the adult in trouble. The secrecy is a burden for a young person.”

After meeting with the alleged victims and promising secrecy, according to court documents, Kelly’s friend returned to her Corte Madera home, photographed everything she thought might be relevant, donned gloves and retrieved two used condoms, one from beneath a balcony and one from her daughter’s bedroom. The party hostess put the photographs and the condoms in a paper bag and gave it to another friend who lives in Mill Valley.

About four months passed before law-enforcement officials heard about the incident. In February, a Kent Middle School counselor, a so-called mandatory reporter, informed authorities that a parent told her Kelly may have had sex with multiple boys while she and the boys were intoxicated. A few months after the counselor’s call, a Twin Cities police detective began his investigation.

Detective Toby Miller said the incident remains under investigation, and authorities have not yet determined whether they will press charges against Kelly’s friend in whose home teen-agers were drinking alcohol that night. [The 'Pacific Sun' is withholding the hostess' identity in the interests of protecting the identity of her teenage daughter.]

The hostess appears to have cooperated with authorities. She had her friend in Mill Valley bring to the Twin Cities Police Department a sealed paper bag with the used condoms. And she turned over to police three recorded voice-mail messages Kelly left for her. In one of the messages, court documents say, the former teacher asked if anyone knew about the “Mary Kay Letourneau incident.”

The most infamous of teachers in sex scandals, Letourneau was 34 and the mother of four in 1996 when she began having sex with a sixth grader in her suburban Seattle school district.

On Friday afternoon, Oct. 20, court documents say Kelly brought her two young children to her friend’s house and began to drink red wine and beer. Later in the evening, Kelly’s friend determined she was too drunk to drive home, the documents say. So before the hostess went to bed, she hid Kelly’s car keys.

While the hostess and Kelly’s two children slept, the hostess’s 15-year-old daughter entertained friends. Court documents detail sordid images of teenagers unchaperoned except for the alleged too-drunk-to-drive and flirtatious former teacher. At one point, the documents say, the hostess’s daughter walked into her own bedroom to find one of her 15-year-old male friends naked with her mother’s 40-year-old girlfriend. Stunned, the girl shot photographs.

More details could come out during a preliminary hearing to determine if sufficient evidence exists to force Kelly to stand trial. The hearing is scheduled for Oct. 31.

Earlier this month, Kelly appeared in Marin County Superior Court briefly with Semansky, her attorney, to set the preliminary hearing date. Wearing her long black hair loose and a stylish black pantsuit with high heels, the trim, 5-foot-7-inch Kelly appeared inwardly agitated when Judge Faye D’Opal granted the ‘Marin Independent Journal’’s request to photograph her.

After the hearing, Kelly rushed out of the courtroom with a pony-tailed man Semansky called her boyfriend and two women the attorney identified as Kelly’s mother and sister. Kelly refused to comment. But, outside the courtroom, Semansky said he was surprised the District Attorney filed the charges and described the alleged victims as “sexually aggressive.”

Steven Duditch, a San Rafael attorney who explained his role as working behind the scenes to protect the rights of one of the boys, said he cannot discuss the facts but called Semansky’s claim that the boys were aggressive “ridiculous.”

“All the parties were drinking,” Semansky said. “They were probably nice young boys, nice boys who should have been home. She was in what I think was a blackout. She’s completely remorseful about what’s happened. She’s in therapy. After her divorce, she had problems.

“I just wonder where all the parents were. Would they want to bring their kids to court?”

Prosecutor Mitchell said she expected testifying would be difficult for the victims and their families.

“Going through the court process could be as shame-provoking and anxiety-producing as the offense,” said the therapist who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

“Nobody wants to bring their sexual-assault experiences into a courtroom,” psychologist Grogan said. “There’s an immediate judgment about the victim. It can be a devastating experience to have this happen and then have it explored in a public forum.”

Both therapists said boys generally are more reluctant than girls to come forward as victims of sex crimes because the culture expects males to handle their own problems and because they are supposed to always want to engage in sex.

“There is a stereotype that boys are very interested in having sex with adult women. It can be overwhelming and traumatizing to a young teenage boy. Boys would feel: I gotta do this, when in fact, they may have very mixed feelings, especially if they aspire to be macho guys. Boys are expected to be more sexually experienced than girls, that the definition of their masculinity comes from their sexual prowess. A real man would never turn down this opportunity. That’s not reality. That’s a fantasy. It really hides the potential vulnerability of young men,” Grogan said.

Of the 430 sexual-abuse interviews he has conducted at the Prandi Center, he said no more than five have involved female perpetrators. But both therapists said they have treated adult men who as children were devastated and overwhelmed after sex with adult women.

“It’s a very complicated dynamic to explain,” Grogan said. “It so flies in the face of public perception.”

Ronnie Cohen can be reached at ronniecohen@comcast.net.